neuroscience computing terms

We know a lot more about computing terms for computers than for the brain. It is likely that the following aspects about the brain are being investigated  currently, in which case I would like to know their technical terms and learn about the research into these aspects.

1. Sometimes, while I am driving to some place, I forget to thing about a route beforehand. On the way, I realize I have to plan my route and "load the program" to plan it. I can distinctly observe a "processing time" to plan out this route, and sometimes this processing time causes me to miss an exit, an exit which was in the planned route.


2. Sometimes, while I set out to drive to a location and start thinking about something else, I arrive at a different (often traveled) location without realizing it. The closest analogy I can think of is a "non-interactive background process ". I cannot say (or can I?) that this is a subconscious act, because I distinctly remember making the decisions to make the turns, "processing" the speeds and the degrees of rotations on the steering wheels. So, was I semi-conscious?

Are the above aspects recognized and studied as neurological phenomenon?

Patter matching and rationalization.

What we gain from experience, or "muscle memory" is mostly like pattern matching. People who don't go through proper training eventually gain some skills through experience. Formal training however, also indulges the rational part of the brain, which leads to better organization of the knowledge. As a result, we can acquire the same skills much faster.

1. We need to indulge the rational part of the brain to better organize our knowledge, and acquire the skills faster.
2. We need to indulge the "pattern recognition" part of the brain, in order to build muscle memory in order to react faster in real time. 

Silver Rule

Golden Rule: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself " 

Silver Rule: "One should treat others as what they would tolerate from others"

Thoughts on artificial vs natural languages

Computer languages are built primarily to execute algorithms, where as natural are primarily built for communication.

There are certain protocols which computers use for communication. So, it would be more apt to compare  natural languages with computer protocols.

Tools to describe  algorithms (such as pseudocodes) are perhaps the closest natural language analogues of computer languages.

Computer communication protocols don't serve as wide a purpose as natural languages. This would very likely reflect in the complexity of their structure.

Is it possible to construct fuzzy computer communication protocols?

Sometime back, we are discussing the new version of Turing tests, where computers have to decipher the meaning of a sentence in order to correctly parse it. For example, statements like:

"Tara didn't like  Mary because she was annoying",  and
"Mary kept Tara happy because she was generous".

In both sentences, the pronoun "she" can be correctly attributed only if the meaning of the sentence is deciphered. The structure of the sentence itself is not sufficient. Both the syntax and the semantics are needed for accurate attribution.

Perhaps, object orientedness in computer languages comes close to this phenomenon. I am not knowledgeable about communication protocols, but is likely some of them are object oriented. I just googled and there seems to be some interesting work regarding inter-software layer and nework protocols.

Actually, I think "state dependent behavior" of a computer comes more closer to the above natural language phenomenon. That is, what a function returns doesn't just depend no its code and input parameters, but the state of the system as well. 

5th Amendment

Is there any  justification for this amendment other than forced concession? Answering an hypothetical comes to mind. 

Undergraduate Research / Independent studies

Often, you come across problems which seem to require application of well established techniques. I think it would be helpful to maintain a list of these problems as they are perfect candidates for undergrad research and independent studies. It helps the students get a grasp of existing techniques and if a part of the problem cannot be solved by existing techniques, may lead to a paper. :)

Time Perception

I think "time-perception" and consciousness are mutually related phenomenon. From scientific perspective, if consciousness is an emergent property of physical processes, is there a theoretical limit on minimum time-resolution of perception?